<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History&#8217;s Top Brain Computation Insights: Day 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/02/historys-top-brain-computation-insights-day-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/02/historys-top-brain-computation-insights-day-1/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the cognitive revolution in neuroscience</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/02/historys-top-brain-computation-insights-day-1/#comment-4624</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/02/historys-top-brain-computation-insights-day-1/#comment-4624</guid>
		<description>G'day MC,

Hippocrates offered his philosophical opinion on this issue. I am not decided upon this. 

This is the reason why I think you might be correct;

If the mind is not a direct product/implementation of neural activity then it must effect the brain all of the time - as the brain knows/remembers consciousness. (Obviously this action could not by definition be scientifically verified as it would lie within noise/physical probability of events). It is therefore simpler to assume the mind is a direct product/implementation of neural activity.

This is the reason why I think you might be incorrect;

Philosophically, what is the point of the mind if it does not do anything?

Thanks for your articles MC they are very interesting. I am working on neural network software myself and have found some very useful references. 

Richard

[[Are we sure we know people's dreams?]]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day MC,</p>
<p>Hippocrates offered his philosophical opinion on this issue. I am not decided upon this. </p>
<p>This is the reason why I think you might be correct;</p>
<p>If the mind is not a direct product/implementation of neural activity then it must effect the brain all of the time - as the brain knows/remembers consciousness. (Obviously this action could not by definition be scientifically verified as it would lie within noise/physical probability of events). It is therefore simpler to assume the mind is a direct product/implementation of neural activity.</p>
<p>This is the reason why I think you might be incorrect;</p>
<p>Philosophically, what is the point of the mind if it does not do anything?</p>
<p>Thanks for your articles MC they are very interesting. I am working on neural network software myself and have found some very useful references. </p>
<p>Richard</p>
<p>[[Are we sure we know people&#8217;s dreams?]]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
