<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History’s Top Brain Computation Insights: Day 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/12/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/12/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-11/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the cognitive revolution in neuroscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:18:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/12/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-11/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/12/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-11/#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>This was a deep &quot;reductionist&quot; moment that I think also must deserve some credit for overturning vitalism and the idea that some &quot;vital force&quot; distinguishes living matter from ordinary matter. Also you might see it as finishing what Galvani started when he touched his statically charged scalpel to an exposed nerve of a dead frog. More than &quot;cognition,&quot; H&amp;H&#039;s explanation of APs is about what &quot;animates&quot; animals--including us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a deep &#8220;reductionist&#8221; moment that I think also must deserve some credit for overturning vitalism and the idea that some &#8220;vital force&#8221; distinguishes living matter from ordinary matter. Also you might see it as finishing what Galvani started when he touched his statically charged scalpel to an exposed nerve of a dead frog. More than &#8220;cognition,&#8221; H&amp;H&#8217;s explanation of APs is about what &#8220;animates&#8221; animals&#8211;including us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

