<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History’s Top Brain Computation Insights: Day 13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the cognitive revolution in neuroscience</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>It was just that every other day had simply added to the previous day's summary, so I was used to that...

Not claiming it was wrong or anything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just that every other day had simply added to the previous day&#8217;s summary, so I was used to that&#8230;</p>
<p>Not claiming it was wrong or anything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>I edited the implication summary to include a bit more about localization within cortex. Note that hippocampus is part of the temporal lobe of cortex (hence it is encompassed in the statement "is involved in ... memory (e.g., temporal lobe)").</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I edited the implication summary to include a bit more about localization within cortex. Note that hippocampus is part of the temporal lobe of cortex (hence it is encompassed in the statement &#8220;is involved in &#8230; memory (e.g., temporal lobe)&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-483</guid>
		<description>I assume you mean in the "implications" summary...
Yesterday's insight is incorporated into "cortex", which is now said to be "involved in perception, action, and &lt;i&gt;memory&lt;/i&gt;".

I'm trying to keep the summary concise, and went back and forth on whether to have an explicit reference to hippocampus in there. Ultimately, since it's part of cortex (though not neocortex) I felt this sentence incorporated yesterday's post while expanding it with today's.

Let me know if you have a compelling argument for including an explicit reference to hippocampus in the summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you mean in the &#8220;implications&#8221; summary&#8230;<br />
Yesterday&#8217;s insight is incorporated into &#8220;cortex&#8221;, which is now said to be &#8220;involved in perception, action, and <i>memory</i>&#8220;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to keep the summary concise, and went back and forth on whether to have an explicit reference to hippocampus in there. Ultimately, since it&#8217;s part of cortex (though not neocortex) I felt this sentence incorporated yesterday&#8217;s post while expanding it with today&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Let me know if you have a compelling argument for including an explicit reference to hippocampus in the summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/04/14/history%e2%80%99s-top-brain-computation-insights-day-13/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>What happened to the hippocampus line from yesterday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the hippocampus line from yesterday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
