<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The role of reward and cognitive control in decision making</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the cognitive revolution in neuroscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:18:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/#comment-23453</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/#comment-23453</guid>
		<description>I think it may be that Balleine is just not good at writing.  If you&#039;re in the mood for an excruciating article to read, try killing some language processing cells with the article this quote came from...

&quot;For example, whereas lesions of the BLA do not affect acquisition of conditioned approach towards food during a tone or light CS, they do abolish the sensitivity of approach responses elicited by that CS to post-training devaluation of its associated US.&quot;  --from &quot;Parallel Incentive Processing&quot;, Balleine &amp; Killcross, 2006 Trends in Neuro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it may be that Balleine is just not good at writing.  If you&#8217;re in the mood for an excruciating article to read, try killing some language processing cells with the article this quote came from&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;For example, whereas lesions of the BLA do not affect acquisition of conditioned approach towards food during a tone or light CS, they do abolish the sensitivity of approach responses elicited by that CS to post-training devaluation of its associated US.&#8221;  &#8211;from &#8220;Parallel Incentive Processing&#8221;, Balleine &amp; Killcross, 2006 Trends in Neuro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VM</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>VM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>Its interesting that they don&#039;t cite Damasio in this review, because he has asserted for years that decision making relies on emotion (I&#039;d lump reward processing in with this).  For example, he described several individuals with focal orbitofrontal lesions who could conceive of several solutions to a complex, open-ended word problem, but could not decide on which would be the best solution.  These individuals also reported a total loss of affect or emotional tone.  If I recall correctly, Damasio claims that the ability to decide between possible actions relies on an &quot;emotional&quot; evaluation of those actions before they are performed -- i.e. the correct action &quot;feels&quot; right relative to the others.

I think that Damasio&#039;s arguments about the specific brain structures that support this (e.g. the exact source of &quot;somatic markers&quot;) is controversial in some circles, but I buy the dependency of decision making on emotion that he posits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting that they don&#8217;t cite Damasio in this review, because he has asserted for years that decision making relies on emotion (I&#8217;d lump reward processing in with this).  For example, he described several individuals with focal orbitofrontal lesions who could conceive of several solutions to a complex, open-ended word problem, but could not decide on which would be the best solution.  These individuals also reported a total loss of affect or emotional tone.  If I recall correctly, Damasio claims that the ability to decide between possible actions relies on an &#8220;emotional&#8221; evaluation of those actions before they are performed &#8212; i.e. the correct action &#8220;feels&#8221; right relative to the others.</p>
<p>I think that Damasio&#8217;s arguments about the specific brain structures that support this (e.g. the exact source of &#8220;somatic markers&#8221;) is controversial in some circles, but I buy the dependency of decision making on emotion that he posits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/09/24/the-role-of-reward-and-cognitive-control-in-decision-making/#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>The second author is likely the one and only Mauricio Delgado.  I would never suspect him of being provocative.  Well, he&#039;s a Jets fan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second author is likely the one and only Mauricio Delgado.  I would never suspect him of being provocative.  Well, he&#8217;s a Jets fan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

