<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Will to be Free, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the cognitive revolution in neuroscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 00:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ry Rivard</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-47202</link>
		<dc:creator>Ry Rivard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-47202</guid>
		<description>A problem with using self-awareness to salvage free will is that some evidence suggests that we, in fact, become self-aware of some decisions only after they are made.

http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases/2008/pressRelease20080414/

A possible problem with such a study, though, could be instrumental sensitivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A problem with using self-awareness to salvage free will is that some evidence suggests that we, in fact, become self-aware of some decisions only after they are made.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases/2008/pressRelease20080414/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases/2008/pressRelease20080414/</a></p>
<p>A possible problem with such a study, though, could be instrumental sensitivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>I suppose I&#039;m a compatiblist regarding free will and determinism. Even if I could always predict a person&#039;s next action I would still consider him/her as having free will (as long as those actions weren&#039;t strongly coerced by another individual). I don&#039;t think free will and determinism are polar opposites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I&#8217;m a compatiblist regarding free will and determinism. Even if I could always predict a person&#8217;s next action I would still consider him/her as having free will (as long as those actions weren&#8217;t strongly coerced by another individual). I don&#8217;t think free will and determinism are polar opposites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-4805</guid>
		<description>I wonder, though, if we could always accurately predict what someone was going to do before they did it, wouldn&#039;t this prove determinism? It would be strong evidence for determinism at the very least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder, though, if we could always accurately predict what someone was going to do before they did it, wouldn&#8217;t this prove determinism? It would be strong evidence for determinism at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-4802</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/11/06/the-will-to-be-free-part-ii/#comment-4802</guid>
		<description>In a universe of one-way time and no do-overs, at least from our perspective, I see no possibility of demonstrating either free will or determinism - which I think is why this has been debated for centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a universe of one-way time and no do-overs, at least from our perspective, I see no possibility of demonstrating either free will or determinism &#8211; which I think is why this has been debated for centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
